Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
AbstractMachine learning has evolved into an enabling technology for a wide range of highly successful applications. The potential for this success to continue and accelerate has placed machine learning (ML) at the top of research, economic, and political agendas. Such unprecedented interest is fuelled by a vision of ML applicability extending to healthcare, transportation, defence, and other domains of great societal importance. Achieving this vision requires the use of ML in safety-critical applications that demand levels of assurance beyond those needed for current ML applications. Our article provides a comprehensive survey of the state of the art in the assurance of ML, i.e., in the generation of evidence that ML is sufficiently safe for its intended use. The survey covers the methods capable of providing such evidence at different stages of the machine learning lifecycle, i.e., of the complex, iterative process that starts with the collection of the data used to train an ML component for a system, and ends with the deployment of that component within the system. The article begins with a systematic presentation of the ML lifecycle and its stages. We then define assurance desiderata for each stage, review existing methods that contribute to achieving these desiderata, and identify open challenges that require further research. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2019 | 10.1145/3453444 | ACM Computing Surveys |
Keywords | DocType | Volume |
Machine learning lifecycle, machine learning workflow, safety-critical systems, assurance, assurance evidence | Journal | 54 |
Issue | ISSN | Citations |
5 | 0360-0300 | 3 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.36 | 0 | 3 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rob Ashmore | 1 | 8 | 1.78 |
| Radu Calinescu | 2 | 905 | 63.01 |
| Colin Paterson | 3 | 112 | 10.76 |