Title | ||
---|---|---|
A PolSAR Scattering Power Factorization Framework and Novel Roll-Invariant Parameter-Based Unsupervised Classification Scheme Using a Geodesic Distance |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
We propose a generic scattering power factorization framework (SPFF) for polarimetric synthetic aperture radar (PolSAR) data to directly obtain
<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$N$ </tex-math></inline-formula>
scattering power components along with a residue power component for each pixel. Each scattering power component is factorized into similarity (or dissimilarity) using elementary targets and a generalized volume model. The similarity measure is derived using a geodesic distance between pairs of
<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$4\times 4$ </tex-math></inline-formula>
real Kennaugh matrices. In standard model-based decomposition schemes, the
<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$3\times 3$ </tex-math></inline-formula>
Hermitian-positive semi-definite covariance (or coherency) matrix is expressed as a weighted linear combination of scattering targets following a fixed hierarchical process. In contrast, under the proposed framework, a convex splitting of unity is performed to obtain the weights while preserving the dominance of the scattering components. The product of the total power (Span) with these weights provides the nonnegative scattering power components. Furthermore, the framework, along with the geodesic distance (
<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${GD}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>
) is effectively used to obtain specific roll-invariant parameters such as scattering-type parameter (
<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\alpha _{GD}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>
), helicity parameter (
<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\tau _{GD}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>
), and purity parameter (
<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$P_{GD}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>
). A
<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$P_{GD}/\alpha _{GD}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>
unsupervised classification scheme is also proposed for PolSAR images. The SPFF, the roll invariant parameters, and the classification results are assessed using C-band RADARSAT-2 and L-band ALOS-2 images of San Francisco. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2019 | 10.1109/TGRS.2019.2957514 | IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing |
Keywords | DocType | Volume |
Factorization,framework,geodesic distance (GD),polarimetric synthetic aperture radar (PolSAR),radar polarimetry,roll-invariant parameters,scattering power,unsupervised classification | Journal | 58 |
Issue | ISSN | Citations |
5 | 0196-2892 | 0 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.34 | 0 | 4 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Debanshu Ratha | 1 | 0 | 1.01 |
Eric Pottier | 2 | 0 | 0.34 |
Avik Bhattacharya | 3 | 55 | 20.13 |
Alejandro C. Frery | 4 | 368 | 38.29 |