Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Accurate weather data is important for improving agricultural productivity in developing countries. Unfortunately, weather sensors can fail for a wide variety of reasons. One approach to detecting failed sensors is to identify statistical anomalies in the joint distribution of sensor readings. This powerful method can break down if some of the sensor readings are missing. This paper evaluates five strategies for handling missing values in anomaly detection: (a) mean imputation, (b) MAP imputation, (c) reduction (reduced-dimension anomaly detectors via feature bagging), (d) marginalization (for density estimators only), and (e) proportional distribution (for tree-based methods only). Our analysis suggests that MAP imputation and proportional distribution should give better results than mean imputation, reduction, and marginalization. These hypotheses are largely confirmed by experimental studies on synthetic data and on anomaly detection benchmark data sets using the Isolation Forest (IF), LODA, and EGMM anomaly detection algorithms. However, marginalization worked surprisingly well for EGMM, and there are exceptions where reduction works well on some benchmark problems. We recommend proportional distribution for IF, MAP imputation for LODA, and marginalization for EGMM. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2019 | 10.1145/3314344.3332490 | COMPASS '19 - PROCEEDINGS OF THE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING & SUSTAINABLE SOCIETIES |
DocType | Citations | PageRank |
Conference | 0 | 0.34 |
References | Authors | |
0 | 2 | |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tadesse Zemicheal | 1 | 0 | 0.34 |
| Thomas G. Dietterich | 2 | 9336 | 1722.57 |