Title | ||
---|---|---|
Investigating the Feasibility of Multi-Scan Terrestrial Laser Scanning to Characterize Tree Communities in Southern Boreal Forests. |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) has proven to accurately represent individual trees, while the use of TLS for plot-level forest characterization has been studied less. We used 91 sample plots to assess the feasibility of TLS in estimating plot-level forest inventory attributes, namely the stem number (N), basal area (G), and volume (V) as well as the basal area weighed mean diameter (D-g) and height (H-g). The effect of the sample plot size was investigated by using different-sized sample plots with a fixed scan set-up to also observe possible differences in the quality of point clouds. The Gini coefficient was used to measure the variation in tree size distribution at the plot-level to investigate the relationship between stand heterogeneity and the performance of the TLS-based method. Higher performances in tree detection and forest attribute estimation were recorded for sample plots with a low degree of tree size variation. The TLS-based approach captured 95% of the variation in H-g and V, 85% of the variation in D-g and G, and 67% of the variation in N. By increasing the sample plot size, the tree detection rate was decreased, and the accuracy of the estimates, especially G and N, decreased. This study emphasizes the feasibility of TLS-based approaches in plot-level forest inventories in varying southern boreal forest conditions. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2019 | 10.3390/rs11121423 | REMOTE SENSING |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
TLS,ground-based LiDAR,point cloud,forest inventory | Biodiversity,Remote sensing,Forest inventory,Taiga,Geology,Terrestrial laser scanning,Point cloud | Journal |
Volume | Issue | Citations |
11 | 12 | 0 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.34 | 0 | 7 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Tuomas Yrttimaa | 1 | 0 | 0.34 |
ninni saarinen | 2 | 6 | 3.53 |
Ville Kankare | 3 | 65 | 9.21 |
Xinlian Liang | 4 | 193 | 23.72 |
Juha Hyyppä | 5 | 439 | 66.75 |
Markus Holopainen | 6 | 357 | 40.95 |
Mikko Vastaranta | 7 | 298 | 34.91 |