Paper Info
Title
Strong Equivalence For Argumentation Frameworks With Collective Attacks
Abstract
Argumentation frameworks with collective attacks are a prominent extension of Dung's abstract argumentation frameworks, where an attack can be drawn from a set of arguments to another argument. These frameworks are often abbreviated as SETAFs. Although SETAFs have received increasing interest recently, the notion of strong equivalence, which is fundamental in nonmonotonic formalisms to characterize equivalent replacements, has not yet been investigated. In this paper, we study how strong equivalence between SETAFs can be decided with respect to the most important semantics and also consider variants of strong equivalence.
Year
DOI
Venue
2019
10.1007/978-3-030-30179-8_11
ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, KI 2019
DocType
Volume
ISSN
Conference
11793
0302-9743
Citations 
PageRank 
References 
0
0.34
0
Authors
3
Name
Order
Citations
PageRank
Wolfgang Dvorák127124.57
Anna Rapberger202.37
Stefan Woltran31603121.99