Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Resolution parameters in graph clustering represent a size and quality trade-off. We address the task of efficiently solving a parameterized graph clustering objective for all values of a resolution parameter. Specifically, we consider an objective we call LambdaPrime, involving a parameter $\lambda \in (0,1)$. This objective is related to other parameterized clustering problems, such as parametric generalizations of modularity, and captures a number of specific clustering problems as special cases, including sparsest cut and cluster deletion. While previous work provides approximation results for a single resolution parameter, we seek a set of approximately optimal clusterings for all values of $\lambda$ in polynomial time. In particular, we ask the question, how small a family of clusterings suffices to optimize -- or to approximately optimize -- the LambdaPrime objective over the full possible spectrum of $\lambda$? We obtain a family of logarithmically many clusterings by solving the parametric linear programming relaxation of LambdaPrime at a logarithmic number of parameter values, and round their solutions using existing approximation algorithms. We prove that this number is tight up to a constant factor. Specifically, for a certain class of ring graphs, a logarithmic number of feasible solutions is required to provide a constant-factor approximation for the LambdaPrime LP relaxation in all parameter regimes. We additionally show that for any graph with $n$ nodes and $m$ edges, there exists a set of $m$ or fewer clusterings such that for every $\lambda \in (0,1)$, the family contains an exact solution to the LambdaPrime objective. There also exists a set of $O(\log n)$ clusterings that provide a $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximate solution in all parameter regimes; we demonstrate simple graph classes for which these bounds are tight. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2020 | 10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2020.39 | MFCS |
DocType | Citations | PageRank |
Conference | 0 | 0.34 |
References | Authors | |
0 | 5 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Junhao Gan | 1 | 121 | 6.63 |
David F. Gleich | 2 | 919 | 57.23 |
Nate Veldt | 3 | 25 | 6.78 |
Anthony Wirth | 4 | 593 | 40.40 |
Zhang Xin | 5 | 0 | 0.34 |