Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
A wide variety of design strategies, tools, and processes are used across the game industry. Prior work has shown that these processes are often collaborative, with experts in different domains contributing to different parts of the whole. However, the ways in which these professionals give and receive peer feedback have not yet been studied in depth. In this paper we present results from interviews with industry professionals at two game studios, describing the ways they give feedback. We propose a new, six step process that describes the full feedback cycle from making plans to receive feedback to reflecting and acting upon that feedback. This process serves as a starting point for researchers studying peer feedback in games, and allows for comparison of processes across different types of studios. It will also help studios formalize their understanding of their own processes and consider alternative processes that might better fit their needs. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2019 | 10.1145/3311350.3347176 | CHI PLAY'19: PROCEEDINGS OF THE ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER-HUMAN INTERACTION IN PLAY |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Game design, peer feedback, design processes, game studios | Computer science,Game industry,Peer feedback,Multimedia | Conference |
Citations | PageRank | References |
0 | 0.34 | 0 |
Authors | ||
6 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Joseph Seering | 1 | 28 | 7.68 |
| Ray Mayol | 2 | 0 | 0.34 |
| Erik Harpstead | 3 | 61 | 10.70 |
| Tianying Chen | 4 | 1 | 1.02 |
| Amy Shannon Cook | 5 | 0 | 1.35 |
| Jessica Hammer | 6 | 68 | 25.95 |