Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Network models are applied across many domains where data can be represented as a network. Two prominent paradigms for modelling networks are statistical models (probabilistic models for the observed network) and mechanistic models (models for network growth and/or evolution). Mechanistic models are better suited for incorporating domain knowledge, to study effects of interventions (such as changes to specific mechanisms) and to forward simulate, but they typically have intractable likelihoods. As such, and in a stark contrast to statistical models, there is a relative dearth of research on model selection for such models despite the otherwise large body of extant work. In this article, we propose a simulator-based procedure for mechanistic network model selection that borrows aspects from Approximate Bayesian Computation along with a means to quantify the uncertainty in the selected model. To select the most suitable network model, we consider and assess the performance of several learning algorithms, most notably the so-called Super Learner, which makes our framework less sensitive to the choice of a particular learning algorithm. Our approach takes advantage of the ease to forward simulate from mechanistic network models to circumvent their intractable likelihoods. The overall process is flexible and widely applicable. Our simulation results demonstrate the approach's ability to accurately discriminate between competing mechanistic models. Finally, we showcase our approach with a protein-protein interaction network model from the literature for yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae). |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2020 | 10.1093/comnet/cnz024 | JOURNAL OF COMPLEX NETWORKS |
Keywords | DocType | Volume |
mechanistic network model,model selection,Super Learner,likelihood-free methods | Journal | 8 |
Issue | ISSN | Citations |
2 | 2051-1310 | 0 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.34 | 0 | 3 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sixing Chen | 1 | 0 | 0.34 |
| Antonietta Mira | 2 | 100 | 14.65 |
| Jukka-pekka Onnela | 3 | 475 | 36.55 |