Title | ||
---|---|---|
Bilinear Factorization Via Recursive Sample Factoring For Low-Rank Hyperspectral Image Recovery |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Low-rank hyperspectral image recovery (LRHSIR) is a very challenging task in various computer vision applications for its inherent complexity. Hyperspectral image (HSI) contains much more information than a regular image due to significant number of spectra bands and the spectral information can be considered as multiview. In this paper, a method of bilinear factorization via recursive sample factoring (BF-RSF) is proposed. Different from traditional low rank models with each data point being treated equally, the importance of each data point is measured by the sample factoring that imposes a penalty on each sample in our BF-RSF model. The sample factoring is a cosine similarity metric learnt from the angle between each data point and the principal component of the low-rank matrix in the feature space. That is, the closer a data point to the principal component vector, the more likely it is a clean data point. By imposing the sample factoring onto the training dataset, the outliers or noise will be detected and their effect will be suppressed. Therefore, a better low-rank structure of clean data can be obtained especially in a heavy noisy scenario, with the effect of noisy data points in modeling being suppressed. Extensive experimental results on SalinasA, demonstrate that BF-RSF outperforms state-of-the-art low-rank matrix recovery methods in image clustering tasks with various levels of corruptions. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2019 | 10.1007/978-3-030-34113-8_44 | IMAGE AND GRAPHICS, ICIG 2019, PT III |
Keywords | DocType | Volume |
Hyperspectral image (HSI), Bilinear factorization, Sample factoring, Cosine similarity metric | Conference | 11903 |
ISSN | Citations | PageRank |
0302-9743 | 0 | 0.34 |
References | Authors | |
0 | 5 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Yuxuan Wang | 1 | 0 | 0.34 |
Timothy Apasiba Abeo | 2 | 0 | 1.69 |
Liangjun Wang | 3 | 7 | 4.21 |
Dickson Keddy Wornyo | 4 | 2 | 2.05 |
Xiangjun Shen | 5 | 50 | 13.58 |