Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Process mining methods allow analysts to use logs of historical executions of business processes in order to gain knowledge about the actual behavior of these processes. One of the most widely studied process mining operations is automated process discovery. An event log is taken as input by an automated process discovery method and produces a business process model as output that captures the control-flow relations between tasks that are described by the event log. In this setting, this paper provides a systematic comparative evaluation of existing implementations of automated process discovery methods with domain experts by using a real life event log extracted from an international software engineering company and four quality metrics: understandability, correctness, precision, and usefulness. The evaluation results highlight gaps and unexplored trade-offs in the field and allow researchers to improve the lacks in the automated process discovery methods in terms of usability of process discovery techniques in industry. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2019 | 10.1109/EDOC.2019.00026 | 2019 IEEE 23rd International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC) |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
User Evaluation,Process Mining,Process Discovery,BPMN | Software engineering,Business process,Computer science,Usability,Correctness,Implementation,Business process modeling,Business process discovery,Business Process Model and Notation,Process mining | Conference |
ISSN | ISBN | Citations |
2325-6354 | 978-1-7281-2703-3 | 0 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.34 | 20 | 4 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simone Agostinelli | 1 | 1 | 3.05 |
| Fabrizio Maria Maggi | 2 | 46 | 20.83 |
| Andrea Marrella | 3 | 273 | 35.71 |
| Fredrik Milani | 4 | 0 | 2.03 |