Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
In collaborative Production Systems Engineering (PSE), decisions of detail engineers depend on results of previous design decisions regarding Product, Process, and Resource (PPR), coming from other basic or detail engineering disciplines. However, the engineering results exchanged between disciplines often represent the production system view only. PPR design decisions are important to facilitate the product/ion-aware exploration of the system design space, but are hard to express and trace in modeling approaches with only limited support for PPR. In this paper, we report on a survey of modeling approaches, which combine process and product modeling. We investigate the PPR modeling capabilities for product/ion-aware systems design and for tracing design decisions in the engineering process. Major finding is that most of the investigated modeling approaches fulfill general requirements well, but address requirements regarding tracing PPR design decisions at most partially. As an exception, the Formal Process Description (FPD) provides good capabilities for PPR modeling and provides the foundations for tracing design decisions between basic to detail engineering. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2019 | 10.1109/INDIN41052.2019.8972147 | 2019 IEEE 17th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN) |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Product-Process-Resource (PPR),Survey,Capability Analysis,Tracing Design Decisions | Systems engineering,Production Systems Engineering,Process description,Systems design,System view,Product modeling,Engineering design process,Engineering,Tracing | Conference |
Volume | ISSN | ISBN |
1 | 1935-4576 | 978-1-7281-2928-0 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
0 | 0.34 | 8 |
Authors | ||
5 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lukas Kathrein | 1 | 1 | 2.05 |
| Kristof Meixner | 2 | 3 | 6.28 |
| Deitar Winkler | 3 | 0 | 0.34 |
| Arndt Lüder | 4 | 0 | 0.34 |
| Stefan Biffl | 5 | 1305 | 134.26 |