Name
Title | ||
|---|---|---|
Views on Quality Requirements in Academia and Practice: Commonalities, Differences, and Context-Dependent Grey Areas |
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Context: Quality requirements (QRs) are a topic of constant discussions both in industry and academia. Debates entwine around the definition of quality requirements, the way how to handle them, or their importance for project success. While many academic endeavors contribute to the body of knowledge about QRs, practitioners may have different views. In fact, we still lack a consistent body of knowledge on QRs since much of the discussion around this topic is still dominated by observations that are strongly context-dependent. This holds for both academic and practitioners’ views. Our assumption is that, in consequence, those views may differ. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2020 | 10.1016/j.infsof.2019.106253 | Information and Software Technology |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Quality requirements,Non-functional requirements,Context factors,Requirements engineering,Survey,Eempirical study | Body of knowledge,Systems engineering,Public relations,Computer science,Perception,Gray (horse),Project success | Journal |
Volume | ISSN | Citations |
121 | 0950-5849 | 0 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.34 | 0 | 4 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Andreas Vogelsang | 1 | 83 | 31.23 |
| Jonas Eckhardt | 2 | 96 | 9.24 |
| Daniel Mendez | 3 | 2 | 5.48 |
| Moritz Berger | 4 | 0 | 0.34 |