Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
In this paper, we study the secrecy provisioning downlink transmission in an aerial-assisted network, where the unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) serves as an aerial platform to provide secure transmission for the mobile users (MUs) with coexist of Internet of Things (IoT) nodes (INs). Specifically, secure transmission is required for MUs to combat eavesdropping attacks and a desired successful transmission probability should be ensured for INs to receive the public instruction massages. To improve the secrecy rates (SRs) for MUs, we consider an eavesdropper-free area, i.e., protected zone, surrounding the UAV. With non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) for MUs, the power allocation to each MU is optimized to maximize the minimum secrecy rate of MUs within the protected zone, under the constraints of successful receiving probability requirements for INs. To solve this problem, we first prove that the max-min SR can be obtained when SRs of all users are equal, and then a dichotomy-based successive power allocation policy is proposed. Numerical results show that higher max-min secrecy rate can be achieved by our proposed power allocation policy than the traditional policy. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2019 | 10.1109/GLOBECOM38437.2019.9013815 | 2019 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) |
Keywords | DocType | ISSN |
NOMA-based UAV-assisted communications,protected zone,secrecy provisioning downlink transmission,aerial-assisted network,unmanned aerial vehicle,mobile users,desired successful transmission probability,public instruction massages,eavesdropper-free area,nonorthogonal multiple access,max-min secrecy rate,Internet of Things,IoT,eavesdropping attacks,successful receiving probability,successive power allocation policy | Conference | 1930-529X |
ISBN | Citations | PageRank |
978-1-7281-0963-3 | 0 | 0.34 |
References | Authors | |
17 | 6 | |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zhisheng Yin | 1 | 0 | 0.68 |
| Min Jia | 2 | 158 | 39.37 |
| Wei Wang | 3 | 0 | 0.34 |
| Nan Cheng | 4 | 970 | 81.34 |
| Feng Lyu | 5 | 0 | 0.34 |
| Xuemin Shen | 6 | 15389 | 928.67 |