Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Motivation: Large scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have resulted in the identification of a wide range of genetic variants related to a host of complex traits and disorders. Despite their success, the individual single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis approach adopted in most current GWAS can be limited in that it is usually biologically simple to elucidate a comprehensive genetic architecture of phenotypes and statistically underpowered due to heavy multiple-testing correction burden. On the other hand, multiple-SNP analyses (e.g. gene-based or region-based SNP-set analysis) are usually more powerful to examine the joint effects of a set of SNPs on the phenotype of interest. However, current multiple-SNP approaches can only draw an overall conclusion at the SNP-set level and does not directly inform which SNPs in the SNP-set are driving the overall genotype phenotype association. Results: In this article, we propose a new permutation-assisted tuning procedure in lasso (plasso) to identify phenotype-associated SNPs in a joint multiple-SNP regression model in GWAS. The tuning parameter of lasso determines the amount of shrinkage and is essential to the performance of variable selection. In the proposed plasso procedure, we first generate permutations as pseudo-SNPs that are not associated with the phenotype. Then, the lasso tuning parameter is delicately chosen to separate true signal SNPs and non-informative pseudo-SNPs. We illustrate plasso using simulations to demonstrate its superior performance over existing methods, and application of plasso to a real GWAS dataset gains new additional insights into the genetic control of complex traits. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2020 | 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa229 | BIOINFORMATICS |
DocType | Volume | Issue |
Journal | 36 | 12 |
ISSN | Citations | PageRank |
1367-4803 | 0 | 0.34 |
References | Authors | |
0 | 8 | |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Songshan Yang | 1 | 0 | 1.01 |
| Jiawei Wen | 2 | 0 | 0.34 |
| Scott T Eckert | 3 | 0 | 0.34 |
| Yaqun Wang | 4 | 0 | 0.68 |
| Dajiang J. Liu | 5 | 5 | 2.58 |
| Rongling Wu | 6 | 149 | 33.45 |
| Runze Li | 7 | 112 | 20.80 |
| Xiang Zhan | 8 | 2 | 2.14 |