Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
There has been a surge of progress in recent years in developing algorithms for testing and learning quantum states that achieve optimal copy complexity [1]-[6]. Unfortunately, they require the use of entangled measurements across many copies of the underlying state and thus remain outside the realm of what is currently experimentally feasible. A natural question is whether one can match the copy complexity of such algorithms using only independent-but possibly adaptively chosen-measurements on individual copies. We answer this in the negative for arguably the most basic quantum testing problem: deciding whether a given d-dimensional quantum state is equal to or ε-far in trace distance from the maximally mixed state. While it is known how to achieve optimal O(d/ε
<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>
) copy complexity using entangled measurements, we show that with independent measurements, Ω(d
<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">4/3</sup>
/ε
<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup>
) is necessary, even if the measurements are chosen adaptively. This resolves a question posed in [7]. To obtain this lower bound, we develop several new techniques, including a chain-rule style proof of Paninski's lower bound for classical uniformity testing, which may be of independent interest. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2020 | 10.1109/FOCS46700.2020.00070 | 2020 IEEE 61st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS) |
Keywords | DocType | ISSN |
quantum property testing,quantum tomography,distribution testing | Conference | 1523-8288 |
ISBN | Citations | PageRank |
978-1-7281-9622-0 | 0 | 0.34 |
References | Authors | |
0 | 3 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Sébastien Bubeck | 1 | 1472 | 92.28 |
Sitan Chen | 2 | 1 | 6.46 |
Jerry Li | 3 | 229 | 22.67 |