Title | ||
---|---|---|
The Time-Invariant Multidimensional Gaussian Sequential Rate-Distortion Problem Revisited |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
We revisit the sequential rate-distortion (SRD) tradeoff problem for vector-valued Gauss–Markov sources with mean-squared error distortion constraints. Our study is partly motivated by the question recently raised in the paper “Rate-cost tradeoffs in control” (in
<italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Proc. 54th Annu. Allerton Conf. Commun., Control, Comput.</italic>
, 2016, pp. 1157–1164) regarding the correctness of its solution algorithm known in the literature. We show via a counterexample that the dynamic reverse water-filling algorithm suggested by (15) of the paper “Stochastic linear control over a communication channel” (
<italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">IEEE Trans. Autom. Control</italic>
, vol. 49, pp. 1549–1561, 2004) is not applicable to this problem, and consequently, the closed-form expression of the asymptotic SRD function derived in (17) of the paper “Stochastic linear control over a communication channel” (
<italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">IEEE Trans. Autom. Control</italic>
, vol. 49, pp. 1549–1561, 2004) is not correct in general. Nevertheless, we show that the multidimensional Gaussian SRD function is semidefinite representable, and thus, it is readily computable. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2020 | 10.1109/TAC.2019.2941444 | IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control |
Keywords | DocType | Volume |
Distortion,Heuristic algorithms,Rate-distortion,Markov processes,Random processes,Closed-form solutions,Programming | Journal | 65 |
Issue | ISSN | Citations |
5 | 0018-9286 | 1 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.37 | 1 | 3 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Photios Stavrou | 1 | 49 | 13.47 |
Takashi Tanaka | 2 | 34 | 12.22 |
Sekhar Tatikonda | 3 | 29 | 5.82 |