Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Neural module networks (NMNs) are a popular approach for modeling compositionality: they achieve high accuracy when applied to problems in language and vision, while reflecting the compositional structure of the problem in the network architecture. However, prior work implicitly assumed that the structure of the network modules, describing the abstract reasoning process, provides a faithful explanation of the model's reasoning; that is, that all modules perform their intended behaviour. In this work, we propose and conduct a systematic evaluation of the intermediate outputs of NMNs on NLVR2 and DROP, two datasets which require composing multiple reasoning steps. We find that the intermediate outputs differ from the expected output, illustrating that the network structure does not provide a faithful explanation of model behaviour. To remedy that, we train the model with auxiliary supervision and propose particular choices for module architecture that yield much better faithfulness, at a minimal cost to accuracy. |
Year | Venue | DocType |
|---|---|---|
2020 | ACL | Conference |
Volume | Citations | PageRank |
2020.acl-main | 0 | 0.34 |
References | Authors | |
0 | 7 | |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sanjay Subramanian | 1 | 1 | 3.78 |
| Ben Bogin | 2 | 20 | 4.06 |
| Nitish Gupta | 3 | 17 | 4.70 |
| Tomer Wolfson | 4 | 0 | 1.01 |
| Sameer Singh | 5 | 1060 | 71.63 |
| Jonathan Berant | 6 | 982 | 53.86 |
| Matthew Gardner | 7 | 704 | 38.49 |