Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
We describe experiments on quality estimation to select the best translation among multiple options for a given source sentence. We consider a realistic and challenging setting where the translation systems used are unknown, and no relative quality assessments are available for the training of prediction models. Our findings indicate that prediction errors are higher in this blind setting. However, these errors do not have a negative impact in performance when the predictions are used to select the best translation, compared to non-blind settings. This holds even when test conditions (text domains, MT systems) are different from model building conditions. In addition, we experiment with quality prediction for translations produced by both translation systems and human translators. Although the latter are on average of much higher quality, we show that automatically distinguishing the two types of translation is not a trivial problem. |
Year | Venue | DocType |
|---|---|---|
2014 | EAMT | Conference |
Citations | PageRank | References |
0 | 0.34 | 0 |
Authors | ||
2 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kashif Shah | 1 | 103 | 11.69 |
| lucia specia | 2 | 1217 | 122.84 |