Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Social distancing as a form of nonpharmaceutical intervention has been enacted in many countries as a form of mitigating the spread of COVID-19. There has been a large interest in mathematical modeling to aid in the prediction of both the total infected population and virus-related deaths, as well as to aid government agencies in decision making. As the virus continues to spread, there are both economic and sociological incentives to minimize time spent with strict distancing mandates enforced, and/or to adopt periodically relaxed distancing protocols, which allow for scheduled economic activity. The main objective of this study is to reduce the disease burden in a population, here measured as the peak of the infected population, while simultaneously minimizing the length of time the population is socially distanced, utilizing both a single period of social distancing as well as periodic relaxation. We derive a linear relationship among the optimal start time and duration of a single interval of social distancing from an approximation of the classic epidemic SIR model. Furthermore, we see a sharp phase transition region in start times for a single pulse of distancing, where the peak of the infected population changes rapidly; notably, this transition occurs well before one would intuitively expect. By numerical investigation of more sophisticated epidemiological models designed specifically to describe the COVID-19 pandemic, we see that all share remarkably similar dynamic characteristics when contact rates are subject to periodic or one-shot changes, and hence lead us to conclude that these features are universal in epidemic models. On the other hand, the nonlinearity of epidemic models leads to non-monotone behavior of the peak of infected population under periodic relaxation of social distancing policies. This observation led us to hypothesize that an additional single interval social distancing at a proper time can significantly decrease the infected peak of periodic policies, and we verified this improvement numerically. While synchronous quarantine and social distancing mandates across populations effectively minimize the spread of an epidemic over the world, relaxation decisions should not be enacted at the same time for different populations. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2021 | 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2021.04.004 | Annual Reviews in Control |
Keywords | DocType | Volume |
COVID-19,Epidemic models,Nonpharmaceutical intervention,Social distancing | Journal | 51 |
ISSN | Citations | PageRank |
1367-5788 | 0 | 0.34 |
References | Authors | |
8 | 3 | |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mahdiar Sadeghi | 1 | 0 | 0.34 |
| James Greene | 2 | 0 | 0.34 |
| Eduardo D. Sontag | 3 | 3134 | 781.88 |