Paper Info
Title
The COVID-19 Infodemic: Can the Crowd Judge Recent Misinformation Objectively?
Abstract
Misinformation is an ever increasing problem that is difficult to solve for the research community and has a negative impact on the society at large. Very recently, the problem has been addressed with a crowdsourcing-based approach to scale up labeling efforts: to assess the truthfulness of a statement, instead of relying on a few experts, a crowd of (non-expert) judges is exploited. We follow the same approach to study whether crowdsourcing is an effective and reliable method to assess statements truthfulness during a pandemic. We specifically target statements related to the COVID-19 health emergency, that is still ongoing at the time of the study and has arguably caused an increase of the amount of misinformation that is spreading online (a phenomenon for which the term "infodemic" has been used). By doing so, we are able to address (mis)information that is both related to a sensitive and personal issue like health and very recent as compared to when the judgment is done: two issues that have not been analyzed in related work. In our experiment, crowd workers are asked to assess the truthfulness of statements, as well as to provide evidence for the assessments as a URL and a text justification. Besides showing that the crowd is able to accurately judge the truthfulness of the statements, we also report results on many different aspects, including: agreement among workers, the effect of different aggregation functions, of scales transformations, and of workers background / bias. We also analyze workers behavior, in terms of queries submitted, URLs found / selected, text justifications, and other behavioral data like clicks and mouse actions collected by means of an ad hoc logger.
Year
DOI
Venue
2020
10.1145/3340531.3412048
CIKM '20: The 29th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management Virtual Event Ireland October, 2020
DocType
ISBN
Citations 
Conference
978-1-4503-6859-9
1
PageRank 
References 
Authors
0.35
0
8
Name
Order
Citations
PageRank
Kevin Roitero13013.74
Michael Soprano212.72
Beatrice Portelli310.35
Damiano Spina434729.96
Vincenzo Della Mea522.06
Giuseppe Serra628024.51
Stefano Mizzaro7348.33
Gianluca Demartini8627.99