Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Purpose: Pelvic bone segmentation in CT has always been an essential step in clinical diagnosis and surgery planning of pelvic bone diseases. Existing methods for pelvic bone segmentation are either hand-crafted or semi-automatic and achieve limited accuracy when dealing with image appearance variations due to the multi-site domain shift, the presence of contrasted vessels, coprolith and chyme, bone fractures, low dose, metal artifacts, etc. Due to the lack of a large-scale pelvic CT dataset with annotations, deep learning methods are not fully explored.Methods: In this paper, we aim to bridge the data gap by curating a large pelvic CT dataset pooled from multiple sources, including 1184 CT volumes with a variety of appearance variations. Then, we propose for the first time, to the best of our knowledge, to learn a deep multi-class network for segmenting lumbar spine, sacrum, left hip, and right hip, from multiple-domain images simultaneously to obtain more effective and robust feature representations. Finally, we introduce a post-processor based on the signed distance function (SDF).Results: Extensive experiments on our dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of our automatic method, achieving an average Dice of 0.987 for a metal-free volume. SDF post-processor yields a decrease of 15.1% in Hausdorff distance compared with traditional post-processor.Conclusion: We believe this large-scale dataset will promote the development of the whole community and open source the images, annotations, codes, and trained baseline models at https://github.com/ICT-MIRACLE-lab/CTPelvic1K. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2021 | 10.1007/s11548-021-02363-8 | INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY |
Keywords | DocType | Volume |
CT dataset, Pelvic segmentation, Deep learning, SDF post-processing | Journal | 16 |
Issue | ISSN | Citations |
5 | 1861-6410 | 0 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.34 | 18 | 12 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Pengbo Liu | 1 | 0 | 0.34 |
Hu Han | 2 | 752 | 40.02 |
Yuanqi Du | 3 | 0 | 1.01 |
Heqin Zhu | 4 | 0 | 0.34 |
Yinhao Li | 5 | 0 | 0.34 |
Fengshou Gu | 6 | 23 | 23.43 |
Honghu Xiao | 7 | 0 | 0.34 |
Jun Li | 8 | 5 | 2.37 |
Chunpeng Zhao | 9 | 0 | 0.68 |
Xiao Li | 10 | 0 | 0.68 |
Xinbao Wu | 11 | 0 | 0.68 |
Zhou S. Kevin | 12 | 474 | 41.40 |