Title
The Effects Of Baseline Length In Computed Tomography Perfusion Of Liver
Abstract
Objective: Computed Tomography perfusion (CTp) of liver is very attractive for predictive and prognostic purposes, but motion artefacts and radiation dose connected to duration of examinations jeopardize the reproducibility of perfusion values, thwarting CTp daily application in clinics. The goal is showing to what extent these issues can be faced by shortening the CTp unenhanced stage (i.e., the baseline).Methods: 59 patients with colorectal cancer underwent undelayed hepatic CTp examinations. For each patient, fifteen virtual examinations E tau simulating different scan delays tau is an element of[1..15] s were achieved from the undelayed original sequence E-0. Absolute (AD), percentage (PD) and compound differences (CD tau) were computed between E-0 and each E-tau for baseline and perfusion values and measured in HU and arbitrary units (a.u.), respectively. Patients were grouped and counted based on the differences achieved.Results: Maximum perfusion CD tau <10 a.u. and baseline CD tau <7 HU were achieved. For tau <= 10 s, maximum perfusion CD tau is an element of[5,6) a.u. was found in one patient only as well as maximum baseline CD tau is an element of[2,3) HU. Blood flow (BF), hepatic perfusion index and arterial BF showed the lowest CD tau, while portal BF and total BF the highest ones. PD is practically always higher than AD.Conclusion: The approach presented allows clinicians to design the shortest CTp acquisition protocol, selecting the highest delay compliant with the required accuracy for the chosen perfusion parameters, to limit patient's motion and improve image quality.Significance: A short CTp protocol allows strengthening the reliability of perfusion values, and correctness of clinical outcomes, advancing CTp introduction in the standard clinical practice.
Year
DOI
Venue
2020
10.1016/j.bspc.2020.102135
BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING AND CONTROL
Keywords
DocType
Volume
Blood flow, Time concentration curves, Measurement errors, Baseline, Reproducibility
Journal
62
ISSN
Citations 
PageRank 
1746-8094
0
0.34
References 
Authors
0
4
Name
Order
Citations
PageRank
Silvia Malavasi120.86
Alessandro Bevilacqua220026.45
Giampaolo Gavelli352.40
Domenico Barone400.34