Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Whereas ordinary types approximate the results, session types approximate communication among computations. As a form of typestate, they describe not only what is communicated now but also what is to be communicated next. Writing session-typed programs in an ordinary programming language such an OCaml requires inordinary cleverness to simulate type-level computations and linear typing – meaning the implementation and the error messages are very hard to understand. One is constantly reminded of template metaprogramming in C++. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2020 | 10.1007/978-3-030-59025-3_5 | FLOPS |
DocType | Citations | PageRank |
Conference | 0 | 0.34 |
References | Authors | |
0 | 2 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Oleg Kiselyov | 1 | 0 | 0.34 |
Keigo Imai | 2 | 0 | 0.34 |