Title
Impact of Cognitive Biases on Progressive Visualization
Abstract
Progressive visualization is fast becoming a technique in the visualization community to help users interact with large amounts of data. With progressive visualization, users can examine intermediate results of complex or long running computations, without waiting for the computation to complete. While this has shown to be beneficial to users, recent research has identified potential risks. For example, users may misjudge the uncertainty in the intermediate results and draw incorrect conclusions or see patterns that are not present in the final results. In this article, we conduct a comprehensive set of studies to quantify the advantages and limitations of progressive visualization. Based on a recent report by Micallef <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">et al.</i> , we examine four types of cognitive biases that can occur with progressive visualization: <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">uncertainty bias</i> , <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">illusion bias</i> , <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">control bias</i> , and <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">anchoring bias</i> . The results of the studies suggest a cautious but promising use of progressive visualization – while there can be significant savings in task completion time, accuracy can be negatively affected in certain conditions. These findings confirm earlier reports of the benefits and drawbacks of progressive visualization and that continued research into mitigating the effects of cognitive biases is necessary.
Year
DOI
Venue
2022
10.1109/TVCG.2021.3051013
IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
Keywords
DocType
Volume
Bias,Cognition,Computer Graphics,Uncertainty
Journal
28
Issue
ISSN
Citations 
9
1077-2626
1
PageRank 
References 
Authors
0.35
36
5
Name
Order
Citations
PageRank
Marianne Procopio140.71
Abigail Mosca2122.14
Carlos E. Scheidegger358430.83
Eugene Wu469145.52
Remco Chang598364.96