Name
Title | ||
|---|---|---|
Effectively Extracting Iceberg Freeboard Using Bi-Temporal Landsat-8 Panchromatic Image Shadows |
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
The freshwater flux from icebergs into the Southern Ocean plays an important role in the global climate through its impact on the deep-water formation. Large uncertainties exist in the ice volume transported by Southern Ocean icebergs due to the sparse spatial and temporal coverage of observations, especially observations of ice thickness. The iceberg freeboard is a critical geometric parameter for measuring the thickness of an iceberg and then estimating its volume. This study developed a new, highly efficient shadow-height method to precisely measure the freeboard of various icebergs surrounded by sea ice using Landsat-8 Operational Land Imager 15-m bi-temporal panchromatic image shadows at low-solar-elevation angles. We evaluated and validated shadow length precision according to bi-temporal measurements and comparison with the measurements from the unmanned aerial vehicle. We determined freeboard precision according to shadow length precision and solar elevation angle. In our case study area, 4832 available freeboard measuring points with shadow length precision better than 2 pixels covered 376 icebergs with sizes ranging from 0.002 to 0.7 km(2) and with freeboard ranging from 2.3 to 83.4 m. At the solar elevation angles of 5.2 degrees, the freeboard precision of 64.1% data could reach 1 m and 86.9% could reach 2 m. Our proposed method effectively filled in the data gap of existing freeboard measurement methods. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2021 | 10.3390/rs13030430 | REMOTE SENSING |
Keywords | DocType | Volume |
iceberg, freeboard, shadow height, Antarctic, Landsat-8, optical remote sensing | Journal | 13 |
Issue | Citations | PageRank |
3 | 0 | 0.34 |
References | Authors | |
0 | 6 | |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zhenfu Guan | 1 | 0 | 0.34 |
| Xiao Cheng | 2 | 0 | 1.69 |
| Yan Liu | 3 | 0 | 1.35 |
| Teng Li | 4 | 72 | 21.44 |
| Baogang Zhang | 5 | 0 | 0.68 |
| Zhitong Yu | 6 | 0 | 0.34 |