Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Multichannel SAR system operating in the sliding spotlight mode has the capacity of imaging with very high resolution as requested by future spaceborne synthetic aperture radar (SAR) mission; hence, it has been attracted more and more attention in the SAR community. In a multichannel sliding spotlight SAR system with $N$ channels, the overall Doppler bandwidth of the data acquired by each channel is greater than $N \cdot \text {PRF}$ ; thus, the preprocessing algorithms (channel mismatch calibration and signal reconstruction) are no more available. To address this issue, a full-aperture imaging method for azimuth multichannel sliding spotlight mode is proposed in this article. First, the raw data of each channel need to be preprocessed based on a deramping operation, which can obtain an unambiguous Doppler spectrum. Afterward, the algorithm proposed for single-channel sliding spotlight mode can be performed. Finally, to avoid possible back-folded SAR images, postprocessing after focusing is demanded in some cases. The imaging results of the data acquired by GaoFen-3 (GF-3) are given for the first time in this article, which proves the effectiveness of the proposed imaging method and demonstrates the capacity of high-resolution wide-swath imaging of the multichannel sliding spotlight mode. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2022 | 10.1109/TGRS.2021.3068208 | IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING |
Keywords | DocType | Volume |
Azimuth, Synthetic aperture radar, Imaging, Doppler effect, Image resolution, Spaceborne radar, Data acquisition, Azimuth multichannel, back-folded SAR image, channel mismatch calibration, signal reconstruction, sliding spotlight, synthetic aperture radar (SAR) | Journal | 60 |
ISSN | Citations | PageRank |
0196-2892 | 0 | 0.34 |
References | Authors | |
0 | 7 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Tingzhu Fang | 1 | 0 | 0.34 |
Yunkai Deng | 2 | 292 | 54.84 |
Da Liang | 3 | 0 | 5.07 |
Lei Zhang | 4 | 195 | 22.87 |
Heng Zhang | 5 | 0 | 0.34 |
Huaitao Fan | 6 | 0 | 5.75 |
Weidong Yu | 7 | 19 | 4.60 |