Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
AbstractHighlights •Rank-1 property of the signal transmission matrix in OFDM-DCSK system is exploited to achieve noise reduction and lower BER.• ℓ p-norm based minimization algorithm is devised to realize the proposed low-rank matrix approximation procedure in the receiver even in the presence of impulsive noise.•The BER expression of the proposed rank-1 property based receiver is derived. AbstractIn this paper, the problem of receiver design for orthogonal frequency division multiplexing differential chaos shift keying (OFDM-DCSK) communication systems is addressed. By exploiting the rank-1 property of the symbol matrix, we propose to apply dimensionality reduction on the time-domain data symbols received from the OFDM-DCSK transmitter for noise reduction, followed by chaotic demodulation on the resultant symbols to decode the information bits. In the presence of additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN), the rank-1 matrix approximation can be simply achieved by the truncated singular value decomposition, corresponding to the solution of ℓ 2-norm minimization. While for impulsive noise environments such as in power line communication systems, we develop an alternating optimization algorithm for ℓ p-based matrix factorization, where 0 < p < 2. The bit error rate (BER) of our approach in AWGN is also analyzed and verified. Simulation results demonstrate that the devised receiver is superior to the conventional OFDM-DCSK method in terms of BER and root mean square error performance for AWGN as well as impulsive noise including the Middleton class A distribution and α-stable process. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2021 | 10.1016/j.sigpro.2021.108219 | Periodicals |
Keywords | DocType | Volume |
Bit error , rate , Differential chaos shift , keying, tp-minimization, Implusive , noise | Journal | 188 |
Issue | ISSN | Citations |
C | 0165-1684 | 0 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.34 | 0 | 4 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Zhaofeng Liu | 1 | 6 | 2.11 |
Hing Cheung So | 2 | 0 | 1.01 |
Lin Zhang | 3 | 38 | 22.81 |
Xiao Peng Li | 4 | 0 | 0.34 |