Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Most information in an image is contained in the edge. Sobel edge detection algorithm is a classic method to realize the edge detection of image in the applications of robot vision, including motion detection and object tracking. This paper proposes an area-efficient and energy-efficient Sobel edge detector design utilizing bit-width pruning, shift-add operation and bit-width tuning techniques, to reduce required area and computation significantly with negligible edge information loss, for mobile robot vision applications. As a result, the proposed Sobel edge detector can achieve lower hardware overhead and higher energy efficiency. FPGA implementation shows that the proposed Sobel detector design achieves 33% lower power consumption while maintaining a good detection performance in terms of CP (over 99%,
<tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$P_{co}$</tex>
) and achieving a better processing performance in terms of frame rate (an increasing by 39.5%), as compared to the conventional Sobel detector design, which is suitable for resource-limited and energy-constrained mobile robots in edge IoT applications. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2021 | 10.1109/RCAR52367.2021.9517380 | 2021 IEEE International Conference on Real-time Computing and Robotics (RCAR) |
Keywords | DocType | ISBN |
high efficiency Sobel edge detector,Sobel edge detection algorithm,motion detection,object tracking,area-efficient,energy-efficient Sobel edge detector design,bit-width pruning,bit-width tuning techniques,negligible edge information loss,mobile robot vision applications,edge IoT applications,FPGA implementation,energy-constrained mobile robots,power consumption | Conference | 978-1-6654-3679-3 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
0 | 0.34 | 0 |
Authors | ||
7 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Fei Liu | 1 | 0 | 0.34 |
Jipeng Wang | 2 | 0 | 0.34 |
Bingqiang Liu | 3 | 0 | 0.34 |
Run Min | 4 | 0 | 0.34 |
Guoyi Yu | 5 | 0 | 1.69 |
Fengwei An | 6 | 0 | 0.34 |
Chao Wang | 7 | 0 | 0.34 |