Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
AbstractContent moderation systems for social media have had numerous issues of bias, in terms of race, gender, and ability among many others. One proposal for addressing such issues in automated decision making is by designing for contestability, whereby users can shape and influence how decisions are made. In this study, we conduct a series of participatory design workshops with participants from communities that have experienced problems with social media content moderation in the past. Together with participants, we explore the idea of designing for contestability in content moderation and find that users' designs suggest three fruitful, practical avenues: adding representation, improving communication, and designing with compassion. We conclude with design recommendations drawn from participants' proposals, and reflect on the challenges that remain. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2021 | 10.1145/3476059 | Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction |
DocType | Volume | Issue |
Conference | 5 | CSCW2 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
0 | 0.34 | 0 |
Authors | ||
4 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kristen Vaccaro | 1 | 0 | 0.34 |
| Ziang Xiao | 2 | 3 | 3.57 |
| Kevin Hamilton | 3 | 0 | 0.34 |
| Karrie Karahalios | 4 | 3 | 3.74 |