Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Explainably estimating confidence in published scholarly work offers opportunity for faster and more robust scientific progress. We develop a synthetic prediction market to assess the credibility of published claims in the social and behavioral sciences literature. We demonstrate our system and detail our findings using a collection of known replication projects. We suggest that this work lays the foundation for a research agenda that creatively uses AI for peer review. |
Year | Venue | Keywords |
---|---|---|
2022 | AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence | Prediction Markets,Synthetic Prediction Markets,Feature Extraction,Replication |
DocType | Citations | PageRank |
Conference | 0 | 0.34 |
References | Authors | |
0 | 16 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Sarah Rajtmajer | 1 | 4 | 1.74 |
Christopher Griffin | 2 | 58 | 11.43 |
Jian Wu | 3 | 0 | 2.37 |
Robert Fraleigh | 4 | 0 | 0.34 |
Laxmaan Balaji | 5 | 0 | 0.34 |
Anna Cinzia Squicciarini | 6 | 1301 | 106.30 |
Anthony Kwasnica | 7 | 0 | 0.34 |
David M. Pennock | 8 | 3823 | 451.85 |
Michael McLaughlin | 9 | 0 | 0.34 |
Timothy Fritton | 10 | 0 | 0.34 |
Nishanth Nakshatri | 11 | 0 | 0.34 |
Arjun Menon | 12 | 0 | 0.34 |
Sai Ajay Modukuri | 13 | 0 | 0.34 |
Rajal Nivargi | 14 | 0 | 0.34 |
Xin Wei | 15 | 0 | 0.68 |
C. Lee Giles | 16 | 11154 | 1549.48 |