Title | ||
---|---|---|
STICKER-IM: A 65 nm Computing-in-Memory NN Processor Using Block-Wise Sparsity Optimization and Inter/Intra-Macro Data Reuse |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Computing-in-memory (CIM) is a promising architecture for energy-efficient neural network (NN) processors. Several CIM macros have demonstrated high energy efficiency, while CIM-based system-on-a-chip is not well explored. This work presents a CIM NN processor, named STICKER-IM, which is implemented with sophisticated system integration. Three key innovations are proposed. First, a CIM-friendly block-wise sparsity (BWS) architecture is designed, enabling both activation-sparsity-aware acceleration and weight-sparsity-aware power-saving. Second, an adaptive kernel-/channel-order (KCO) mapping and intra-/inter-macro scheduling strategy is proposed to improve macro utilization and data reuse. Third, an efficient BWS-optimized CIM (BWS-CIM) macro with adaptive power-OFF ADCs is implemented. The STICKER-IM chip was fabricated in 65-nm CMOS technology. Experimental results show 5.8–158-TOPS/W average system energy efficiency on the sparse NN models. The macro/system-level energy efficiency is
<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$4.23\times / 3.06\times $ </tex-math></inline-formula>
higher compared with the state-of-the-art CIM macros and processors. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2022 | 10.1109/JSSC.2022.3148273 | IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits |
Keywords | DocType | Volume |
Adaptive power-OFF,block-wise sparsity (BWS),computing-in-memory (CIM),data-reuse architecture,neural network (NN) processor | Journal | 57 |
Issue | ISSN | Citations |
8 | 0018-9200 | 0 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.34 | 26 | 10 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
J Yue | 1 | 1 | 1.05 |
Y. J. Liu | 2 | 11 | 16.87 |
Z Yuan | 3 | 2 | 2.43 |
X Feng | 4 | 1 | 0.71 |
Y He | 5 | 0 | 1.01 |
Weidong Sun | 6 | 104 | 16.84 |
X. Z. Zhang | 7 | 11 | 13.15 |
Xiao-Sheng Si | 8 | 623 | 46.17 |
G. R. Liu | 9 | 23 | 10.39 |
James Z. Wang | 10 | 7526 | 403.00 |