Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
This paper shows that the pi-calculus with implicit matching is no more expressive than CCS pi, a variant of CCS in which the result of a synchronisation of two actions is itself an action subject to relabelling or restriction, rather than the silent action pi. This is done by exhibiting a compositional translation from the pi-calculus with implicit matching to CCS pi that is valid up to strong barbed bisimilarity. The full pi-calculus can be similarly expressed in CCS pi enriched with the triggering operation of MEIJE. I also show that these results cannot be recreated with CCS in the r<^>ole of CCS pi, not even up to reduction equivalence, and not even for the asynchronous pi-calculus without restriction or replication. Finally I observe that CCS cannot be encoded in the pi-calculus. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2021 | 10.1007/978-3-030-99336-8_20 | PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES AND SYSTEMS, ESOP 2022 |
DocType | Volume | ISSN |
Conference | 13240 | 0302-9743 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
0 | 0.34 | 0 |
Authors | ||
1 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Rob J. van Glabbeek | 1 | 1930 | 134.34 |