Title | ||
---|---|---|
Secrecy Outage Analysis of Relay-User Pairing for Secure Hybrid Satellite-Terrestrial Networks |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
In this paper, we study the physical-layer security of a hybrid satellite-terrestrial network composed of a satellite, multiple terrestrial decode-and-forward (DF) relays and users in the presence of a terrestrial eavesdropper who attempts to tap legitimate information from both satellite and relays. We consider two different scenarios: I) the channel state information (CSI) of wiretap links is known, and II) the CSI of wiretap links is unknown. Accordingly, optimal and suboptimal relay-user pairing schemes are proposed for the aforementioned two scenarios, respectively. Specifically, a relay-user pair maximizing the secrecy rate is chosen as the optimal one to participate in the transmission, where all links’ CSI is used to perform relay-user pairing. However, suboptimal relay-user pairing scheme is designed only relying on the main links’ CSI without requiring wiretap links’ CSI, where a relay-user pair with the maximal transmission rate of main link is selected. Also, closed-form expressions of secrecy outage probability with both integer and rational fading severity parameter are derived in the case of satellite links undergo Shadowed-Rician fading and terrestrial links subject to Rayleigh fading. Furthermore, asymptotic secrecy outage probability analysis is conducted in the high signal-to-noise ratio region. Numerical results reveal that relay-user pairing is beneficial to further improve physical-layer security of the hybrid satellite-terrestrial network. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2022 | 10.1109/TVT.2022.3174621 | IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology |
Keywords | DocType | Volume |
Hybrid satellite-terrestrial network,physical-layer security,relay-user pairing | Journal | 71 |
Issue | ISSN | Citations |
8 | 0018-9545 | 0 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.34 | 25 | 8 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Weifeng Cao | 1 | 0 | 0.34 |
YuLong Zou | 2 | 1671 | 98.76 |
Zhen Yang | 3 | 45 | 13.51 |
Bin Li | 4 | 64 | 16.57 |
Yun Lin | 5 | 96 | 15.05 |
Yong Li | 6 | 2972 | 218.82 |
Wei Wu | 7 | 124 | 54.63 |
Lizhe Liu | 8 | 0 | 0.34 |