Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Text classification is a crucial task in data mining and artificial intelligence. In recent years, deep learning-based text classification methods have made great development. The deep learning methods supervise model training by representing a label as a one-hot vector. However, the one-hot label representation cannot adequately reflect the relation between an instance and the labels, as labels are often not completely independent, and the instance may be associated with multiple labels in practice. Simply representing the labels as one-hot vectors leads to overconfidence in the model, making it difficult to distinguish some label confusions. In this paper, we propose a simulated label distribution method based on concepts (SLDC) to tackle this problem. This method captures the overlap between the labels by computing the similarity between an instance and the labels and generates a new simulated label distribution for assisting model training. In particular, we incorporate conceptual information from the knowledge base into the representation of instances and labels to address the surface mismatching problem when instances and labels are compared for similarity. Moreover, to fully use the simulated label distribution and the original label vector, we set up a multi-loss function to supervise the training process. Expensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of SLDC on five complex text classification datasets. Further experiments also verify that SLDC is especially helpful for confused datasets. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2022 | 10.1007/s44196-022-00144-y | International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems |
Keywords | DocType | Volume |
Text classification, Label distribution learning, Concept knowledge base, Graph attention network | Journal | 15 |
Issue | ISSN | Citations |
1 | 1875-6883 | 0 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.34 | 4 | 5 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hui Li | 1 | 814 | 92.33 |
| Guimin Huang | 2 | 6 | 9.26 |
| Li Yiqun | 3 | 0 | 0.34 |
| Zhang Xiaowei | 4 | 0 | 0.34 |
| Wang Yabing | 5 | 0 | 0.34 |