Name
Title | ||
|---|---|---|
In-Database Machine Learning with CorgiPile: Stochastic Gradient Descent without Full Data Shuffle |
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Stochastic gradient descent (SGD) is the cornerstone of modern ML systems. Despite its computational efficiency, SGD requires random data access that is inherently inefficient when implemented in systems that rely on block-addressable secondary storage such as HDD and SSD, e.g., in-DB ML systems and TensorFlow/PyTorch over large files. To address this impedance mismatch, various data shuffling strategies have been proposed to balance the convergence rate of SGD (which favors randomness) and its I/O performance (which favors sequential access). In this paper, we first conduct a systematic empirical study on existing data shuffling strategies, which reveals that all existing strategies have room for improvement-they suffer in terms of I/O performance or convergence rate. With this in mind, we propose a simple but novel hierarchical data shuffling strategy, CorgiPile. Compared with existing strategies, CorgiPile avoids a full data shuffle while maintaining comparable convergence rate of SGD as if a full shuffle were performed. We provide a non-trivial theoretical analysis of CorgiPile on its convergence behavior. We further integrate CorgiPile into PostgreSQL by introducing three new physical operators with optimizations. Our experimental results show that CorgiPile can achieve comparable convergence rate to the full shuffle based SGD, and 1.6x-12.8x faster than two state-ofthe-art in-DB ML systems, Apache MADlib and Bismarck, on both HDD and SSD. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2022 | 10.1145/3514221.3526150 | PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT OF DATA (SIGMOD '22) |
Keywords | DocType | ISSN |
In-database machine learning, Stochastic Gradient Descent, Shuffle | Conference | 0730-8078 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
0 | 0.34 | 0 |
Authors | ||
12 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lijie Xu | 1 | 0 | 0.34 |
| Shuang Qiu | 2 | 0 | 0.34 |
| Binhang Yuan | 3 | 0 | 1.69 |
| Jiawei Jiang | 4 | 89 | 14.60 |
| Cèdric Renggli | 5 | 9 | 4.23 |
| Shaoduo Gan | 6 | 0 | 0.34 |
| Kaan Kara | 7 | 0 | 0.34 |
| Guoliang Li | 8 | 3077 | 154.70 |
| Ji Liu | 9 | 1352 | 77.54 |
| Wentao Wu | 10 | 394 | 30.53 |
| Jieping Ye | 11 | 0 | 0.34 |
| Ce Zhang | 12 | 803 | 83.39 |