Paper Info
Title
How Well Do CMIP6 Models Simulate the Greening of the Tibetan Plateau?
Abstract
The "warm-humid" climate change across the Tibetan Plateau (TP) has promoted grassland growth and an overall greening trend has been observed by remote sensing products. Many of the current generations of Earth System Models (ESMs) incorporate advanced process-based vegetation growth in the land surface module that can simulate vegetation growth, but the evaluation of their performance has not received much attention, especially over hot spots where projections of the future climate and vegetation growth are greatly needed. In this study, we compare the leaf area index (LAI) simulations of 35 ESMs that participated in CMIP6 to a remote-sensing-derived LAI product (GLASS LAI). The results show that about 40% of the models overestimated the Tibetan Plateau's greening, 48% of the models underestimated the greening, and 11% of the models showed a declining LAI trend. The CMIP6 models generally produced poor simulations of the spatial distribution of LAI trend, and overestimated the LAI trend of alpine vegetation, grassland, and forest, but underestimated meadow and shrub. Compared with other vegetation types, simulations of the forest LAI trend were the worst, the declining trend in forest pixels on the TP was generally underestimated, and the greening of the meadow was underestimated as well. However, the greening of the grassland, was greatly overestimated. For the Tibetan Plateau's averaged LAI, more than 70% of the models overestimated this during the growing seasons of 1981-2014. Similar to the forest LAI trend, the performance of the forest LAI simulation was the worst among the different vegetation types, and the forest LAI was underestimated as well.
Year
DOI
Venue
2022
10.3390/rs14184633
REMOTE SENSING
Keywords
DocType
Volume
Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6), LAI, LAI trend, Tibetan Plateau
Journal
14
Issue
ISSN
Citations 
18
2072-4292
0
PageRank 
References 
Authors
0.34
0
2
Name
Order
Citations
PageRank
Jiafeng Liu100.34
Yaqiong Lu200.34