Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Crop growth depends on the root-zone soil moisture (RZSM) (~top 1m). Accurate estimation of RZSM is vital to optimize irrigation management for saving water and energy while sustaining crop yield. The High-Resolution Land Assimilation System (HRLDAS) from NCAR can generate RZSM at field scales for irrigation management. The soil moisture data from various agriculture sites in the AmeriFlux network, U.S. Climate Reference Network (USCRN), and Soil Climate Analysis Network (SCAN) are used to verify the soil moisture products generated by HRLDAS. Although the HRLDAS products is not location specific and could be applied nationwide, this study will focus on Nebraska for evaluation, validation, and further calibration. We also compared NASA's SMAP surface soil moisture products to HRLDAS surface layer soil moisture. Since the accuracy of the SMAP product is known, this comparison directly validates the HRLDAS surface soil moisture product and indirectly validate its RZSM products. Results from these two validation methods show a good accuracy of HRLDAS soil moisture products. The conspicuous differences between HRLDAS and SMAP products indicate that HRLDAS omits the irrigation activities as its simulation is based on weather variables and energy balance. It's hard for HRLDAS to consider and include the irrigation actions in its results, while as SMAP products remotely sense the soil moisture as it is, the changes caused by irrigation are clearly reflected. Therefore, a simple calibration is applied to the HRLDAS products by including irrigation amount as its variables. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2022 | 10.1109/Agro-Geoinformatics55649.2022.9858974 | 2022 10th International Conference on Agro-geoinformatics (Agro-Geoinformatics) |
Keywords | DocType | ISBN |
soil moisture,irrigation management,validation,HRLDAS,SMAP | Conference | 978-1-6654-7079-7 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
0 | 0.34 | 6 |
Authors | ||
6 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Haoteng Zhao | 1 | 1 | 2.08 |
| Liping Di | 2 | 811 | 98.92 |
| Ziheng Sun | 3 | 1 | 0.72 |
| Eugene Yu | 4 | 21 | 6.77 |
| Chen Zhang | 5 | 8 | 3.31 |
| Li Lin | 6 | 44 | 23.07 |