Name
Papers
Collaborators
PER AHLGREN AND TING YUE
29
31
Citations 
PageRank 
Referers 
348
27.37
598
Referees 
References 
535
402
Search Limit
100598
Title
Citations
PageRank
Year
Algorithmic labeling in hierarchical classifications of publications: Evaluation of bibliographic fields and term weighting approaches10.352021
Comparison of publication-level approaches to ex-post citation normalization10.352019
Granularity of algorithmically constructed publication-level classifications of research publications: Identification of specialties.20.362019
A Comparison Of Citation Disciplinary Structure In Science Between The G7 Countries And The Brics Countries00.342018
Exploring the relation between referencing practices and citation impact: A large-scale study based on Web of Science data.50.392018
Granularity of algorithmically constructed publication-level classifications of research publications: Identification of topics.30.372018
Disciplinary structures in Nature, Science and PNAS: journal and country levels.00.342018
Reply to ‘Comment on “Using multi-level frontiers in DEA models to grade countries/territories” by G.-l. Yang et al. [Journal of Informetrics 10(1) (2016), 238–253]’00.342017
Document Type Profiles in Nature, Science, and PNAS: Journal and Country Level.10.352017
Evolution of three Nobel Prize themes and a Nobel snub theme in chemistry: a bibliometric study with focus on international collaboration.00.342017
Using multi-level frontiers in DEA models to grade countries/territories.30.932016
Grading Countries/Territories Using Dea Frontiers10.392015
Bibliometric analysis of two subdomains in philosophy: free will and sorites80.542015
The correlation between citation-based and expert-based assessments of publication channels: SNIP and SJR vs. Norwegian quality assessments.110.592014
Geographical distance in bibliometric relations within epistemic communities20.362013
Field normalized citation rates, field normalized journal impact and Norwegian weights for allocation of university research funds.60.532012
Experimental comparison of first and second-order similarities in a scientometric context80.562012
The effects and their stability of field normalization baseline on relative performance with respect to citation impact: A case study of 20 natural science departments151.232011
Measuring impact of twelve information scientists using the DCI index30.412010
Document–document similarity approaches and science mapping: Experimental comparison of five approaches290.972009
Bibliographic coupling, common abstract stems and clustering: A comparison of two document-document similarity approaches in the context of science mapping110.702008
Evaluation of retrieval effectiveness with incomplete relevance data: Theoretical and experimental comparison of three measures80.532008
Indexing strategies for Swedish full text retrieval under different user scenarios60.482007
Swedish full text retrieval: Effectiveness of different combinations of indexing strategies with query terms40.472006
Retrieval evaluation with incomplete relevance data: a comparative study of three measures60.622006
Rejoinder: in defense of formal methods70.892004
Author cocitation analysis and Pearson's r131.112004
Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient19412.212003
On A Cognitive Search Strategy00.341999