Title
Evaluation of retrieval effectiveness with incomplete relevance data: Theoretical and experimental comparison of three measures
Abstract
This paper investigates two relatively new measures of retrieval effectiveness in relation to the problem of incomplete relevance data. The measures, Bpref and RankEff, which do not take into account documents that have not been relevance judged, are compared theoretically and experimentally. The experimental comparisons involve a third measure, the well-known mean uninterpolated average precision. The results indicate that RankEff is the most stable of the three measures when the amount of relevance data is reduced, with respect to system ranking and absolute values. In addition, RankEff has the lowest error-rate.
Year
DOI
Venue
2008
10.1016/j.ipm.2007.01.011
Inf. Process. Manage.
Keywords
Field
DocType
social sciences,error rate,natural sciences,information science
Data mining,Information retrieval,Computer science,Artificial intelligence,Machine learning
Journal
Volume
Issue
ISSN
44
1
Information Processing and Management
Citations 
PageRank 
References 
8
0.53
13
Authors
2
Name
Order
Citations
PageRank
Per Ahlgren and Ting Yue134827.37
Leif Grönqvist2171.90