Cyberassured Systems Engineering at Scale | 0 | 0.34 | 2022 |
Formal Reasoning Under Cached Address Translation | 1 | 0.35 | 2020 |
seL4 in Australia: from research to real-world trustworthy systems | 0 | 0.34 | 2020 |
Towards Provable Timing-Channel Prevention | 0 | 0.34 | 2020 |
Can We Prove Time Protection? | 0 | 0.34 | 2019 |
A Formal Approach to Constructing Secure Air Vehicle Software. | 4 | 0.57 | 2018 |
Formally verified software in the real world. | 4 | 0.43 | 2018 |
Bringing Effortless Refinement of Data Layouts to Cogent. | 1 | 0.35 | 2018 |
Introduction to <Emphasis Type="Italic">Milestones in Interactive Theorem Proving</Emphasis> | 2 | 0.40 | 2018 |
The Cogent Case for Property-Based Testing. | 0 | 0.34 | 2017 |
Reasoning about Translation Lookaside Buffers. | 1 | 0.35 | 2017 |
Finite Machine Word Library. | 0 | 0.34 | 2016 |
COGENT: Certified Compilation for a Functional Systems Language. | 1 | 0.36 | 2016 |
Refinement through restraint: bringing down the cost of verification. | 8 | 0.55 | 2016 |
A Framework For The Automatic Formal Verification Of Refinement From Cogent To C | 3 | 0.39 | 2016 |
Interactive Theorem Proving | 0 | 0.34 | 2016 |
Cogent: verifying high-assurance file system implementations | 19 | 0.74 | 2016 |
Qualification of Formal Methods Tools (Dagstuhl Seminar 15182). | 0 | 0.34 | 2015 |
Empirical study towards a leading indicator for cost of formal software verification | 7 | 0.52 | 2015 |
An empirical research agenda for understanding formal methods productivity. | 4 | 0.43 | 2015 |
Automated verification of RPC stub code | 1 | 0.35 | 2015 |
Productivity for proof engineering | 3 | 0.40 | 2014 |
Proof Engineering Considered Essential. | 1 | 0.35 | 2014 |
Comprehensive formal verification of an OS microkernel | 80 | 2.54 | 2014 |
Don't sweat the small stuff: formal verification of C code without the pain | 9 | 0.57 | 2014 |
File systems deserve verification too! | 10 | 0.54 | 2014 |
Concerned with the unprivileged: user programs in kernel refinement | 2 | 0.40 | 2014 |
Formally Verified System Initialisation. | 5 | 0.44 | 2013 |
Towards a verified component platform | 1 | 0.35 | 2013 |
Translation validation for a verified OS kernel | 41 | 1.26 | 2013 |
Formal specifications better than function points for code sizing | 5 | 0.44 | 2013 |
Noninterference for operating system kernels | 18 | 0.74 | 2012 |
Separation Algebra. | 0 | 0.34 | 2012 |
It's Time for Trustworthy Systems | 6 | 0.64 | 2012 |
Challenges and experiences in managing large-scale proofs | 11 | 0.59 | 2012 |
Bridging the Gap: Automatic Verified Abstraction of C. | 19 | 0.79 | 2012 |
Mechanised Separation Algebra. | 6 | 0.48 | 2012 |
Large-scale formal verification in practice: a process perspective | 9 | 0.67 | 2012 |
AI@NICTA. | 0 | 0.34 | 2012 |
Simulation modeling of a large-scale formal verification process | 4 | 0.46 | 2012 |
seL4 enforces integrity | 24 | 1.03 | 2011 |
Provable Security: how feasible is it? | 6 | 0.52 | 2011 |
The road to trustworthy systems | 3 | 0.42 | 2010 |
capDL: a language for describing capability-based systems | 12 | 0.71 | 2010 |
A formally verified OS kernel. now what? | 2 | 0.39 | 2010 |
From a verified kernel towards verified systems | 7 | 0.49 | 2010 |
seL4: formal verification of an operating-system kernel | 84 | 5.86 | 2010 |
The L4.verified project: next steps | 0 | 0.34 | 2010 |
Types, Maps and Separation Logic | 4 | 0.78 | 2009 |
Mind the Gap | 0 | 0.34 | 2009 |