Name
Papers
Collaborators
RONALD ROUSSEAU
109
92
Citations 
PageRank 
Referers 
1071
103.40
1669
Referees 
References 
686
633
Search Limit
1001000
Title
Citations
PageRank
Year
Is low interdisciplinarity of references an unexpected characteristic of Nobel Prize winning research?00.342022
Rank-frequency data and impact in a continuous model: Introducing impact bundles00.342022
Measuring The Relative Intensity Of Collaboration Within A Network00.342021
Mathematical Reflections On Triple Helix Calculations00.342021
"Sparking" And "Igniting" Key Publications Of 2020 Nobel Prize Laureates10.352021
The h-index formalism.10.362021
Bilateral Co-Authorship Indicators Based On Fractional Counting00.342021
Dynamic aspects of domination networks.00.342020
Polar coordinates and generalized h-type indices00.342020
Reflections on and a short review of the science of team science00.342020
-Type indices, partial sums and the majorization order.00.342020
Describing Citations As A Function Of Time00.342020
On the Leydesdorff-Wagner-Bornmann proposal for diversity measurement20.362019
Ego Citation Networks Considered as Domination Networks.00.342019
A refined method for computing bibliographic coupling strengths00.342019
A refined method for computing bibliographic coupling strengths00.342019
Reflections On Tools And Methods For Differentiated Assessments Of Individual Scientists, Groups Of Scientists And Scientific Journals00.342019
Balassa = revealed competitive advantage = activity.00.342019
Measuring scientific contributions with modified fractional counting40.412019
Measuring scientific contributions with modified fractional counting40.412019
Equalities Between H-Type Indices And Definitions Of Rational H-Type Indicators00.342019
A geometric relation between the h-index and the Lorenz curve.00.342019
Measures of linear type lead to a characterization of Zipf functions.00.342019
Infinite sequences and their h-type indices10.432019
Infinite sequences and their h-type indices10.432019
A new approach to explore the knowledge transition path in the evolution of science & technology: From the biology of restriction enzymes to their application in biotechnology.10.362018
Do papers with an institutional e-mail address receive more citations than those with a non-institutional one?00.342018
Delayed Recognition: Recent Developments And A Proposal To Study This Phenomenon As A Fuzzy Concept00.342018
Under-cited influential work by Eugene Garfield.20.382018
The F-Measure For Research Priority30.522018
The repeat rate: from Hirschman to Stirling.30.412018
Growth of the hepatitis literature over the period 1976–2015: What can the relative priority index teach us?00.342018
How important is scientific software in bioinformatics research? A comparative study between international and Chinese research communities.40.382018
Cognitive Distances between Evaluators and Evaluees in Research Evaluation: A Comparison between Three Informetric Methods at the Journal and Subject Category Aggregation Level00.342017
Cognitive Distances between Evaluators and Evaluees in Research Evaluation: A Comparison between Three Informetric Methods at the Journal and Subject Category Aggregation Level00.342017
Reply to ‘Comment on “Using multi-level frontiers in DEA models to grade countries/territories” by G.-l. Yang et al. [Journal of Informetrics 10(1) (2016), 238–253]’00.342017
A journal's impact factor is influenced by changes in publication delays of citing journals.30.412017
Nobel Prize winners 2016: Igniting or sparking foundational publications?70.472017
Scholarly metrics under the microscope: From citation analysis to academic auditing. Edited by BlaiseCronin and Cassidy R.Sugimoto. Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc., 2015. 976 pp. $149.50 hardcover. ISBN 978157387499100.342017
Partial orders for zero-sum arrays with applications to network theory.00.342017
Measuring cognitive distance between publication portfolios.20.372017
Heterogeneity in an undirected network: Definition and measurement.00.342017
Gauging a Firm's Innovative Performance Using an Integrated Structural Index for Patents.00.342017
Contributions of chinese authors in PLOS ONE20.522016
Using multi-level frontiers in DEA models to grade countries/territories.30.932016
Corrigendum to "Is the expertise of evaluation panels congruent with the research interests of the research groups: a quantitative approach based on barycenters" [Journal of Informetrics 9(4) (2015) 704-721].10.372016
Diversity of references as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of journals: Taking similarity between subject fields into account280.982016
Scientific influence is not always visible: The phenomenon of under-cited influential publications.40.382016
Citation data as a proxy for quality or scientific influence are at best PAC (probably approximately correct)20.422016
Interrelations among scientific fields and their relative influences revealed by an input-output analysis.40.452016
  • 1
  • 2