Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Purpose: To show for which publication-citation arrays h-type indices are equal and to reconsider rational h-type indices. Results for these research questions fill some gaps in existing basic knowledge about h-type indices.Design/methodology/approach: The results and introduction of new indicators are based on well-known definitions.Findings: The research purpose has been reached: answers to the first questions are obtained and new indicators are defined.Research limitations: h-type indices do not meet the Bouyssou-Marchant independence requirement.Practical implications: On the one hand, more insight has been obtained for well-known indices such as the h-and the g-index and on the other hand, simple extensions of existing indicators have been added to the bibliometric toolbox. Relative rational h-type indices are more useful for individuals than the existing absolute ones.Originality/value: Answers to basic questions such as "when are the values of two h-type indices equal" are provided. A new rational h-index is introduced. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2019 | 10.2478/jdis-2019-0002 | JOURNAL OF DATA AND INFORMATION SCIENCE |
Keywords | DocType | Volume |
h-index, g-index, Rational h-type indices, Relative rational h-index, Lotkaian framework | Journal | 4 |
Issue | ISSN | Citations |
1 | 2096-157X | 0 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.34 | 8 | 3 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Leo Egghe | 1 | 1588 | 122.76 |
Yves Fassin | 2 | 1 | 0.72 |
Ronald Rousseau | 3 | 1071 | 103.40 |