Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Three-dimensional (3D) field programmable gate array (FPGA) has evoked significant interest in wire-length reduction for routing requirement. However, the complex design of the 3D switch boxes will limit the performance improvement and suffer from the area efficiency problems. This paper proposed a systematic graph model (SGM) for 3D switch boxes design to simplify the design process and reduce the storage memory for path programming. An interlaced 3D switch boxes and two-dimensional (2D) switch boxes placement topology is also presented in this paper to design the 3D FPGA architecture for area efficiency purpose. The 3D place and route tool and TSMC 0.18-µm CMOS process parameters are used to support building the experimental flow for verification. Performance evaluation shows that about 50% storage memory reduction can be obtained by using the proposed SGM-based switch design approach. Additionally, compared with conventional architectures of 2D FPGA, the proposed scheme based on interlaced switch boxes placement approach can approximately achieve 20% delay-power product improvement and 43% area-delay product reduction. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2012 | 10.1002/cta.739 | I. J. Circuit Theory and Applications |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
switch boxes placement topology,proposed sgm-based switch design,interlaced switch boxes placement,fpga architecture,proposed scheme,design process,switch box,three-dimensional fpga architecture design,switch boxes design,area-delay product reduction,complex design,field programmable gate array | Area delay product,Field-programmable gate array,Place and route,Electronic engineering,Cmos process,Engineering design process,Fpga architecture,Mathematics,Graph model,Performance improvement,Embedded system | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
40 | 5 | 0098-9886 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
5 | 0.46 | 24 |
Authors | ||
3 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chun-Lung Hsu | 1 | 59 | 14.53 |
| Yu-Sheng Huang | 2 | 5 | 1.14 |
| Fong-Chao Lee | 3 | 5 | 0.46 |