Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Self-explanation refers to explaining text to oneself while reading. We examined the quality of middle-school students' self-explanations of a science text which were collected while they were engaged with iSTART, an interactive computer program that teaches reading strategies. Our analysis included an examination of how the quality of paraphrases (i.e., restating the sentence) and elaborations (i.e., drawing on prior knowledge) were mediated by individual difference measures (reading comprehension skill and prior science knowledge) and sentence difficulty (based on information density). Reading comprehension skill was an important determinant in the production of paraphrases and elaborations. In addition, reading skill affected the quality of self-explanations produced; that is, skilled readers produced better quality elaborations (e.g., elaborations that helped build a global understanding of the text). Prior knowledge was also important, with high-knowledge students providing more 'distant' paraphrases. Finally, the production of elaborations and paraphrases was influenced by sentence difficulty. Fewer accurate elaborations were produced for the more difficult sentences. Implications for individual differences and sentence difficulty in the production of self-explanations are discussed. |
Year | Venue | Keywords |
|---|---|---|
2004 | ICLS '04 Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Learning sciences | self- explanation,meta-cognitive reading strategies,science text,prior knowledge,self-explaining science text,sentence difficulty,protocol analysis,comprehension skill,prior science knowledge,difficult sentence,important determinant,individual difference measure,learning from text,text comprehension,better quality elaboration,automated tutoring systems,individual difference |
DocType | Citations | PageRank |
Conference | 2 | 0.50 |
References | Authors | |
2 | 3 | |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rachel Best | 1 | 2 | 1.51 |
| Yasuhiro Ozuru | 2 | 2 | 1.51 |
| Danielle S. McNamara | 3 | 393 | 85.67 |