Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology include researchers from many areas: biochemists, physicists, mathematicians, and engineers. The scale of the problems that are discussed ranges from small molecules to complex systems, where many organisms coexist. However, among all these issues, we can highlight genomics, which studies the genomes of microorganisms, plants, and animals. Predicting common patterns, i.e., motifs, in a set of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sequences is one of the important sequence analysis problems, and it has not yet been resolved in an efficient manner. In this study, we study the application of evolutionary multiobjective optimization to solve the motif discovery problem, applied to the specific task of discovering novel transcription factor binding sites in DNA sequences. For this, we have designed, adapted, configured, and evaluated several types of multiobjective metaheuristics. After a detailed study, the results indicate that these metaheuristics are appropriate for discovering motifs. To find good approximations to the Pareto front, we use the hypervolume indicator, which has been successfully integrated into evolutionary algorithms. Besides the hypervolume indicator, we also use the coverage relation to ensure: Which is the best Pareto front? New results have been obtained, which significantly improve those published in previous research works. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2012 | 10.1109/TSMCC.2011.2172939 | IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
bioinformatics,approximation theory,evolutionary computation,dna | DNA binding site,Evolutionary algorithm,Computer science,Evolutionary computation,Multi-objective optimization,Genomics,Artificial intelligence,DNA sequencing,Machine learning,Sequence analysis,Metaheuristic | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
42 | 6 | 1094-6977 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
14 | 0.53 | 23 |
Authors | ||
4 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| David L. González-Álvarez | 1 | 107 | 12.72 |
| Miguel A. Vega-Rodríguez | 2 | 741 | 113.05 |
| Juan Antonio Gómez-Pulido | 3 | 334 | 43.02 |
| Juan Manuel Sánchez-Pérez | 4 | 219 | 28.40 |