Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
In close relationships, snooping on another's mobile device is commonly regarded as an invasion of privacy. The prevalence of such behavior is, however, difficult to assess. We compared two in-person survey techniques, one in which the question about snooping behavior is posed directly, and one in which strong anonymity controls are employed. Results (n=90) reveal that, while in the first case 10% of respondents admitted to snooping, in the second the estimate was 60%. This shows that, although there is a potent social desirability bias at play, strong anonymity controls do improve estimates. Furthermore, it suggests an alarming prevalence of snooping behavior among the target population. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2014 | 10.1145/2559206.2581240 | CHI Extended Abstracts |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
strong anonymity control,potent social desirability bias,in-person survey technique,close relationship,alarming prevalence,mobile device,target population,mobile devices,privacy,methodology | Population,Internet privacy,Social desirability bias,Ask price,Computer science,Computer security,Mobile device,Anonymity,Survey methodology,Privacy laws of the United States | Conference |
Citations | PageRank | References |
3 | 0.40 | 5 |
Authors | ||
3 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Diogo Marques | 1 | 36 | 6.33 |
Tiago Guerreiro | 2 | 366 | 45.90 |
Luis Carriço | 3 | 41 | 5.25 |