Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Research investigating factors in the design of tilt-based interfaces is presented. An experiment with 16 participants used a tablet and a 2D pointing task to compare position-control and velocity-control using device tilt to manipulate an on-screen cursor. Four selection modes were also evaluated, ranging from instantaneous selection upon hitting a target to a 500-ms time delay prior to selection. Results indicate that position-control was approximately 2× faster than velocity-control, regardless of selection delay. Position-control had higher pointing throughput (3.3 bps vs. 1.2 bps for velocity-control), more precise cursor motion, and was universally preferred by participants. |
Year | Venue | Keywords |
|---|---|---|
2014 | Graphics Interface 2012 | selection delay,precise cursor motion,tilt-based interaction,device tilt,selection mode,on-screen cursor,velocity control,instantaneous selection,tilt-based interface,500-ms time delay |
Field | DocType | Citations |
Computer vision,Fitts's law,Computer science,Simulation,Ranging,Artificial intelligence,Throughput,Cursor (user interface) | Conference | 13 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.67 | 22 | 2 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Robert J. Teather | 1 | 329 | 33.04 |
| I. Scott MacKenzie | 2 | 4789 | 729.33 |