Name
Title | ||
|---|---|---|
XML schemas for common bioinformatic data types and their application in workflow systems. |
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
BACKGROUND: Today, there is a growing need in bioinformatics to combine available software tools into chains, thus building complex applications from existing single-task tools. To create such workflows, the tools involved have to be able to work with each other's data – therefore, a common set of well-defined data formats is needed. Unfortunately, current bioinformatic tools use a great variety of heterogeneous formats. RESULTS: Acknowledging the need for common formats, the Helmholtz Open BioInformatics Technology network (HOBIT) identified several basic data types used in bioinformatics and developed appropriate format descriptions, formally defined by XML schemas, and incorporated them in a Java library (BioDOM). These schemas currently cover sequence, sequence alignment, RNA secondary structure and RNA secondary structure alignment formats in a form that is independent of any specific program, thus enabling seamless interoperation of different tools. All XML formats are available at http://bioschemas.sourceforge.net, the BioDOM library can be obtained at http://biodom.sourceforge.net. CONCLUSION: The HOBIT XML schemas and the BioDOM library simplify adding XML support to newly created and existing bioinformatic tools, enabling these tools to interoperate seamlessly in workflow scenarios. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2006 | 10.1186/1471-2105-7-490 | BMC Bioinformatics |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
sequence alignment,xml schema,data type,rna secondary structure,algorithms,bioinformatics,microarrays | World Wide Web,XML,Computer science,Interoperability,Interoperation,XML schema,Data type,Bioinformatics,Workflow,cXML,Document type definition | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
7 | 1 | 1471-2105 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
41 | 1.25 | 25 |
Authors | ||
8 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Philipp N. Seibel | 1 | 78 | 2.49 |
| Jan Krüger | 2 | 76 | 8.32 |
| Sven Hartmeier | 3 | 86 | 2.18 |
| Knut Schwarzer | 4 | 86 | 4.61 |
| Kai Löwenthal | 5 | 41 | 1.25 |
| Henning Mersch | 6 | 58 | 4.24 |
| Thomas Dandekar | 7 | 411 | 23.17 |
| Robert Giegerich | 8 | 1616 | 130.26 |