Title | ||
---|---|---|
A First Step towards the Runtime Analysis of Evolutionary Algorithm Adjusted with Reinforcement Learning |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
A first step towards analyzing runtime complexity of an evolutionary algorithm adaptively adjusted using reinforcement learning is made. We analyze the previously proposed EA+RL method that enhances single-objective optimization by selecting efficient auxiliary fitness functions. Precisely, Random Mutation Hill Climber adjusted with Q-learning using greedy exploration strategy is considered. We obtain both lower and upper bound for the number of fitness function evaluations needed for this EA+RL implementation to solve a modified OneMax problem. It turns out that EA+RL with an inefficient auxiliary fitness function performs on par with a conventional evolutionary algorithm, namely in T(N logN) fitness function evaluations, where N is the size of the OneMax problem. In other words, we show that reinforcement learning successfully ignores inefficient fitness function. A lower bound for the ∊-greedy exploration strategy for ∊ 0 is analyzed as well. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2013 | 10.1109/ICMLA.2013.42 | ICMLA (1) |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
efficient auxiliary fitness function,greedy exploration strategy,fitness function evaluation,n logn,runtime analysis,rl method,inefficient auxiliary fitness function,first step,onemax problem,inefficient fitness function,evolutionary algorithm,reinforcement learning,rl implementation,conventional evolutionary algorithm,theory,learning artificial intelligence,complexity,evolutionary computation | Interactive evolutionary computation,Mathematical optimization,Evolutionary algorithm,Evolutionary robotics,Computer science,Evolutionary computation,Fitness function,Fitness approximation,Artificial intelligence,Machine learning,Learning classifier system,Reinforcement learning | Conference |
Citations | PageRank | References |
5 | 0.47 | 18 |
Authors | ||
3 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Maxim Buzdalov | 1 | 141 | 25.29 |
Arina Buzdalova | 2 | 61 | 9.42 |
Anatoly Shalyto | 3 | 98 | 20.06 |