Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Cumulative citation recommendation refers to the task of filtering a time-ordered corpus for documents that are highly relevant to a predefined set of entities. This task has been introduced at the TREC Knowledge Base Acceleration track in 2012, where two main families of approaches emerged: classification and ranking. In this paper we perform an experimental comparison of these two strategies using supervised learning with a rich feature set. Our main finding is that ranking outperforms classification on all evaluation settings and metrics. Our analysis also reveals that a ranking-based approach has more potential for future improvements. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2013 | 10.1145/2484028.2484151 | SIGIR |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
trec knowledge base acceleration,experimental comparison,future improvement,rich feature set,ranking-based approach,predefined set,main family,main finding,evaluation setting,cumulative citation recommendation | Knowledge base acceleration,Data mining,Information retrieval,Ranking,Ranking SVM,Computer science,Citation,Filter (signal processing),Supervised learning,Feature set | Conference |
Citations | PageRank | References |
21 | 1.26 | 15 |
Authors | ||
2 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Krisztian Balog | 1 | 1797 | 113.68 |
Heri Ramampiaro | 2 | 154 | 20.46 |